Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
J Neurol ; 270(7): 3315-3328, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2312113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate the prognostic value of blood neurofilament light chain protein (NfL) levels in the acute phase of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis after screening on MEDLINE and Scopus to May 23rd 2022. We included studies with hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients without major COVID-19-associated central nervous system (CNS) manifestations and with a measurement of blood NfL in the acute phase as well as data regarding at least one clinical outcome including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need of mechanical ventilation (MV) and death. We derived the age-adjusted measures NfL Z scores and conducted mixed-effects modelling to test associations between NfL Z scores and other variables, encompassing clinical outcomes. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROCs) were used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for blood NfL. RESULTS: We identified 382 records, of which 7 studies were included with a total of 669 hospitalized COVID-19 cases (mean age 66.2 ± 15.0 years, 68.1% males). Median NfL Z score at admission was elevated compared to the age-corrected reference population (2.37, IQR: 1.13-3.06, referring to 99th percentile in healthy controls). NfL Z scores were significantly associated with disease duration and severity. Higher NfL Z scores were associated with a higher likelihood of ICU admission, need of MV, and death. SROCs revealed AUCs of 0.74, 0.80 and 0.71 for mortality, need of MV and ICU admission, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Blood NfL levels were elevated in the acute phase of COVID-19 patients without major CNS manifestations and associated with clinical severity and poor outcome. The marker might ameliorate the performance of prognostic multivariable algorithms in COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Prognosis , Biomarkers , Intermediate Filaments , Central Nervous System , Neurofilament Proteins
2.
Neurol Sci ; 44(6): 1849-1853, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275064

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Measures adopted to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 could have led to a reduction in the rate of non-COVID-19 infections. We assessed whether a similar reduction was present in patients with stroke. METHODS: We performed a hospital-based study nested in a prospective population-based registry. We compared prevalence of infections and in-hospital mortality in subjects admitted for acute stroke between the first pandemic year (study period, from March 2020 to February 2021) and the pre-pandemic year (control period, from March 2019 to February 2020). Infections were reported as pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infections (UTI), and any infection (INF). RESULTS: From the control (n = 677) to the study period (n = 520), the prevalence of INF decreased from 11.5 to 4.6% (p < 0.001) and that of PNA decreased from 6.9 to 2.5% (p = 0.001). No changes in in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay were observed between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reduction of in-hospital pneumonias in patients with stroke was likely attributable to the use of protective measures and limitation of hospital visits. Maintaining some of those measures in the long term may contribute to control infections in hospitalized patients with stroke.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Stroke , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Stroke/complications , Stroke/epidemiology , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia/etiology , Hospitals , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Neurol Sci ; 446: 120591, 2023 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2245810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of patients with new-onset headache following SARS-CoV-2 infection. BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to several neurological manifestations, and headache is a frequent and disabling symptom, both exacerbating pre-existing headache syndromes and causing new-onset ones. METHODS: Patients with new-onset headache after SARS-CoV-2 infection with consent to participate were included, while those ones with previous headaches were excluded. The temporal latency of headache after infection, pain characteristics, and concomitant symptoms were analysed. Moreover, the efficacy of acute and preventive medications was explored. RESULTS: Eleven females (median age 37.0 [10.0-60.0] years old) were included. In most cases, headache onset occurred with the infection, the location of pain varied, and the quality was either pulsating or tightening. Headache was persistent and daily in 8 patients (72.7%), while it occurred in episodes in the remaining subjects. Baseline diagnoses were new daily persistent headache (36.4%), probable new daily persistent headache (36.4%), probable migraine (9.1%), and migraine-like headache secondary to COVID-19 (18.2%). Ten patients received one or more preventive treatments and six of them showed an improvement. CONCLUSION: New-onset headache following COVID-19 is a heterogenous condition with uncertain pathogenesis. This type of headache can become persistent and severe, with a wide spectrum of manifestations (new daily persistent headache being the most represented one) and variable response to treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Migraine Disorders , Female , Humans , Adult , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Headache , Migraine Disorders/complications
4.
Telemed J E Health ; 28(7): 1016-1022, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510877

ABSTRACT

Background: Due to coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italian outpatient clinics were suspended in March-April 2020 and subsequently slowed down. Telemedicine was shown to be useful in headache clinics, despite absence of a detailed protocol for its development. Objective: To describe the implementation of a structured telemedicine protocol during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Since May 2020, we performed a quality improvement study in a Headache Specialist Center in central Italy. We involved patients who had in-person follow-up visits scheduled during suspension and initial reopening of clinics. Patients had two appointments with a nurse specialized in headache care and a headache physician, respectively, using Microsoft Teams®. The service is still active. We collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients, technical details of telemedicine visits, patient feedback, medical judgment about complexity of clinical decisions, and need for in-person re-evaluation. We also performed a Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats analysis to provide a realistic picture of the service. Results: We performed 207 telemedicine visits involving 100 patients with a median age of 44 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-56) years; 76.0% were women and lived at a median of 68 (IQR: 24-109) km from the Center. Thirty-nine (39.0%) were visited for migraine without aura. Patients mostly used a computer (68.1% visits) with high audio-video quality in 93.2% of visits. First and second appointments lasted in median 20 (IQR: 14-25) minutes and 9 (IQR: 7-13) minutes, respectively. Interacting with patients was very easy in 66.7% of visits. Patients reported no difficulty in sharing documents and high satisfaction in 78.6% and 93.5% of visits, respectively. Perceived complexity of clinical decisions was generally low (86.5%), whereas 8.2% of cases required in-person re-evaluation. Conclusions: Telemedicine facilitated follow-ups, ensuring multidisciplinary care and high patient satisfaction, justifying its wider adoption in headache care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Headache/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Patient Satisfaction , Telemedicine/methods
6.
Front Neurol ; 12: 647995, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1210489

ABSTRACT

Introduction: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) is a preventive treatment for chronic migraine (CM), which needs to be administered regularly by a trained clinician every 3 months. The spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic has forced many patients to momentarily stop the scheduled BT-A injections. The goal of this study was to explore whether those patients experienced a worsening of their CM and, if any, the clinical predictors of migraine worsening after BT-A withdrawal. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study. Patients' clinical data were obtained from their clinical documentation stored at each center. In particular, the following variables were collected: the mean number of headache days in the last month (NHD), the average number of painkillers taken in the last month (AC), the average number of days in which patients took, at least, one painkiller in the last month (NDM), the average intensity of migraine using the numeric rating scale (NRS) score in the last month, and the average score obtained at the six-item Headache Impact Test. The variables mentioned earlier were compared before and after BT-A withdrawal. Results: After BT-A suspension, there was a significant increase in the NHD (P = 0.0313, Kruskal-Wallis rank test), AC (P = 0.0421, Kruskal-Wallis rank test), NDM (P = 0.0394, paired t-test), NRS score (P = 0.0069, Kruskal-Wallis rank test), and six-item Headache Impact Test score (P = 0.0372, Kruskal-Wallis rank test). Patients who were not assuming other preventive treatments other than BT-A displayed similar results. Patients who experienced a >30% worsening in NHD after BT-A was withdrawn displayed a longer CM history (P = 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis rank test), a longer MOH duration (P = 0.0017, Kruskal-Wallis rank test), a higher AC value at the baseline (P = 0.0149, Kruskal-Wallis rank test), a higher NDM (P = 0.0024, t-test), and a higher average value of the NRS score (P = 0.0073, Kruskal-Wallis rank test). Conclusion: BT-A withdrawn during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic was associated with a general worsening in patients suffering from CM, hence the need to continue BT-A injection to avoid patients' worsening.

7.
Nutrients ; 13(4)2021 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1194694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The restrictions taken to control the rapid spread of COVID-19 resulted in a sudden, unprecedented change in people's lifestyle, leading to negative consequences on general health. This study aimed to estimate the impact of such changes on migraine severity during 2020 March-May lockdown. METHODS: Patients affected by migraine with or without aura, diagnosed by expert physicians, completed a detailed interview comprehensive of: assessment of migraine characteristics; measure of physical activity (PA) levels; measure of the intake frequency of main Italian foods; the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire investigating sleep disorders. RESULTS: We included 261 patients with a mean age of 44.5 ± 12.3 years. During social distancing, 72 patients (28%) reported a headache worsening, 86 (33%) an improvement, and 103 (39%) a stable headache frequency. A significant decrease of the PA levels during COVID-19 quarantine in the whole study sample was observed (median total metabolic equivalent task (METs) decreased from 1170 to 510; p < 0.001). Additionally, a significant difference was reported on median ISI scores (from 7 to 8; p < 0.001), which were increased in patients who presented a stable or worsening headache. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that the restrictions taken during the pandemic have affected the practice of PA levels and sleep quality in migraine. Hence, PA and sleep quality should be assessed to find strategies for an improvement in quality of life.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Physical Distancing , Adult , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Exercise , Feeding Behavior , Headache/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Life Style , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Sleep , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Stroke ; 51(12): 3746-3750, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1021185

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the rate of hospital admissions for cerebrovascular events and of revascularization treatments for acute ischemic stroke in Italy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. METHODS: The Italian Stroke Organization performed a multicenter study involving 93 Italian Stroke Units. We collected information on hospital admissions for cerebrovascular events from March 1 to March 31, 2020 (study period), and from March 1 to March 31, 2019 (control period). RESULTS: Ischemic strokes decreased from 2399 in 2019 to 1810 in 2020, with a corresponding hospitalization rate ratio (RR) of 0.75 ([95% CI, 0.71-0.80] P<0.001); intracerebral hemorrhages decreased from 400 to 322 (hospitalization RR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.69-0.93]; P=0.004), and transient ischemic attacks decreased from 322 to 196 (hospitalization RR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.51-0.73]; P<0.001). Hospitalizations decreased in Northern, Central, and Southern Italy. Intravenous thrombolyses decreased from 531 (22.1%) in 2019 to 345 in 2020 (19.1%; RR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.99]; P=0.032), while primary endovascular procedures increased in Northern Italy (RR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.13-2.32]; P=0.008). We found no correlation (P=0.517) between the hospitalization RRs for all strokes or transient ischemic attack and COVID-19 incidence in the different areas. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations for stroke or transient ischemic attacks across Italy were reduced during the worst period of the COVID-19 outbreak. Intravenous thrombolytic treatments also decreased, while endovascular treatments remained unchanged and even increased in the area of maximum expression of the outbreak. Limited hospitalization of the less severe patients and delays in hospital admission, due to overcharge of the emergency system by COVID-19 patients, may explain these data.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Ischemic Attack, Transient/epidemiology , Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology , Thrombectomy/statistics & numerical data , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged
9.
Front Neurol ; 11: 597881, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-948041

ABSTRACT

Background: Previous studies during SARS and Ebola pandemics have shown that quarantine is associated with several negative psychological effects, such as post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. These conditions may affect the course of many diseases, including migraine. Although it is possible that the quarantine measures for the current COVID-19 pandemic affect migraine burden, no information is currently available on this issue. Aim: In this study, we aimed to: (1) explore the possible changes in migraine frequency, severity, and days with acute medication intake during quarantine period; (2) evaluate possible differences in migraine outcomes in consideration of lifestyle changes, emotions, pandemic diffusion, and COVID-19 infection. Methods: We interviewed patients who were included in the observational Italian Headache Registry (Registro Italiano Cefalee, RICE), retrospectively collecting information on main headache features, lifestyle factors, emotions, individual infection status, and perception of COVID-19 for 2 months before (pre-quarantine) and after the beginning of the quarantine (quarantine). Inclusion criteria were: age > 18, diagnosis of migraine without aura, migraine with aura and chronic migraine, last in-person visit more than 3 months preceding the beginning of quarantine. Results: A total of 433 migraine subjects agreed to be interviewed. We found an overall reduction in headache frequency (9.42 ± 0.43 days with headache vs. 8.28 ± 0.41) and intensity (6.57 ± 0.19 vs. 6.59 ± 0.21) during the quarantine, compared to pre-quarantine. There was a correlation between improvement and number of days of stay-at-home. When results were stratified for geographic area, we found a tendency toward worsening of headache frequency in northern Italy. Disgust regarding viral infection corresponded to a minor improvement in migraine. Conclusions: Migraine patients showed a mild improvement of migraine features, probably attributable to resilient behavior toward pandemic distress. Disgust regarding the contagion whereas potentially favoring defensive behavior, could potentially worsen migraine. The spontaneous limitation of migraine burden during quarantine could favor patient follow-up via the use of telemedicine visits, reliable diaries, and frequent remote contacts.

10.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 22(10): 1932-1935, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-722345

ABSTRACT

The province of L'Aquila (Central Italy) was marginally affected by COVID-19 pandemic, but changes in health care seeking behaviors were noticed. The authors retrospectively analyzed de-identified data concerning all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations, cardiovascular acute phase treatments, and in-hospital cardiovascular deaths in the province of L'Aquila from January 1 to March 31, in 2020 and 2019. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) comparing 2020 and 2019 for admissions/procedures were calculated through Poisson regression. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the examined time windows was also assessed. Less all-cause (IRR 0.85, P < .001) and cardiovascular (IRR 0.73, P < .001) hospitalizations occurred in 2020 than in 2019. Less daily cardiovascular procedures were also performed (IRR: 0.74, P = .009). A disproportionate decrease in the number of procedures was observed in relation to cardiovascular hospitalizations in 2020 (-5.5%, P = .001). Unlike all-cause mortality, more in-hospital cardiovascular deaths occurred in March 2020 compared with March 2019 (+6.8%, P = .048).


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cost of Illness , Death , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL